Validated · Transparent · Human-centered

AI that does the work. Humans keep the judgment.

2gnoMe AI generates clear, framework-aligned feedback from the evidence you already collect — saving administrators time while keeping professional judgment exactly where it belongs: with educators.

⏱
~1 hr
saved per teacher on narrative writing
πŸ“ˆ
61%*
of observed skill changes are improvements
🏫
~90%
district retention over 3 years
βœ…
0
automated scoring or evaluation decisions

* Of teaching component ratings that change between baseline and end-of-year observations, 61% shift upward. Based on internal platform data.

Quality input → quality feedback → quality growth. Once it works, you forget it's AI.
Why it matters

Districts collect the evidence. 2gnoMe AI turns it into feedback.

Enormous time goes into collecting observation notes, evidence, and reflection data — yet much of it stays locked in forms. 2gnoMe AI turns that evidence into clear, aligned, actionable feedback, without automating judgment or scoring.

Better use of time

Save an hour per teacher

Principals and evaluators get back about one hour per teacher on narrative writing alone — time they can reinvest in coaching, classroom visits, and real conversations with educators.

Consistency

Aligned to your framework

Feedback is organized around your chosen teaching framework — like Danielson's FFT — making evidence easier to interpret, compare, and act on across classrooms and buildings.

Growth

Actionable, teacher-centered

Drafts highlight strengths, focus areas, trends, and next steps — giving teachers clearer, more respectful feedback that supports professional growth, not just compliance.

How it works

Evidence in. Meaningful feedback out.

The pipeline is straightforward — and every step keeps a human in control. Administrators review, edit, and approve before anything reaches a teacher.

1

Observation Evidence

Admin captures notes, ratings, and artifacts in 2gnoMe during classroom visits

2

Anonymized Export

Evidence is anonymized — no names, emails, or direct identifiers sent to AI

3

AI Instruction File

Framework-aligned instructions guide the AI to draft feedback in the right language

4

Draft Feedback

AI generates a coherent, fully editable narrative draft organized to the framework

5

Human Review & Edit

Administrator reviews, rewrites in their voice, and approves before sharing with teacher

The AI never scores, labels, or makes evaluation decisions. Administrators retain full authorship and accountability.

 
β–Ά Watch: AI for Feedback in action
Validated AI

Built to strengthen human judgment, not replace it.

2gnoMe AI is validated by The Danielson Group's AI Credential — recognizing tools that use AI responsibly and in genuine support of professional growth.

Danielson Group AI Validation Badge

Validated by The Danielson Group — the national authority on the Framework for Teaching. Learn more →

πŸ”’ What stays protected

  • Anonymized data only — no names, emails, or direct identifiers
  • No AI scoring, label assignment, or automated evaluation decisions
  • No teacher or student data stored by the AI or reused for training
  • FERPA-compliant environment managed on AWS by 2gnoMe

πŸ§‘‍🏫 What stays human

  • Administrators retain full authorship and accountability
  • Drafts are editable and rewritable in the admin's own voice
  • Feedback remains evidence-based, respectful, and growth-oriented
  • AI accelerates clarity — people define the message

Aligned to Danielson FFT

Grounded in the official Framework for Teaching — honoring its domains, language, and developmental intent.

Draft, Review, Refine

Generates a coherent, fully editable draft. Admins can request evidence references or rewrite sections in their own tone.

Built for educator growth

Designed with educators — strengthens reflection, supports coaching conversations, and keeps learning anchored in real classroom evidence.

What leaders are saying

From the field — principals, coaches, and evaluators.

Early field testing with principals, coaches, and district leaders shows strong trust and time savings — without losing the nuance of human feedback.

"The draft gave me a clear starting point instead of a blank page. I still make it my own, but I'm not spending my nights wordsmithing."
Principal Idaho
"It doesn't evaluate for me — it organizes what I already know about the teacher in a way that's easier to share and discuss."
Instructional Coach Colorado
"The alignment to the Framework for Teaching is what sold our team. It feels like a support, not a shortcut."
District Evaluator South Carolina
Implementation

Fast, safe, and practical to roll out.

Because the AI feature is built on top of the existing 2gnoMe platform, districts can pilot quickly and scale without changing their core systems.

1

Activate

The AI feature turns on inside your existing 2gnoMe portal — no new login, no new system, no IT project required.

2

Observe

Administrators conduct observations as usual. Evidence accumulates in the platform the same way it always has.

3

Review & Share

AI drafts the narrative feedback. The administrator reviews, edits in their voice, approves, and shares with the teacher.

Start with one school. Districts can pilot the AI feature with a single building and scale district-wide without changing any core workflows. Most schools are generating their first AI-assisted feedback draft within the first observation cycle.
See it in your context

AI that supports educators, not replaces them.

Let us show you how 2gnoMe AI works with your frameworks, your evidence, and your district's priorities.

Quality input → quality feedback → quality growth.
πŸŽ₯

Watch the demo

See exactly how AI drafts feedback from observation evidence — and how admins review and refine it.

Watch demo video
πŸ“…

Schedule a live demo

We'll show you how AI for Feedback works with your frameworks, your roles, and your district's priorities.

Book a demo